Paper at a glance
| Publication | Details |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hui Pang and Fengqi Zhang |
| Journal | Energies 11(5), article 1033 |
| Published | 24 April 2018 |
| DOI | 10.3390/en11051033 |
| Reading scope | Abstract and Sections 2–3 reviewed on 10 October 2026 |
What the researchers studied
The authors fit a second-order RC battery model to experimental data using a genetic algorithm, compare simulated terminal voltage with measurements under the same current input, and use an adaptive extended Kalman filter for state-of-charge estimation. Section 2 defines the circuit; Section 3 describes its identification and experimental comparison. Read the publisher’s article.
Connection to Lemonergy
Use the two-branch battery pulse example to inspect how the instantaneous resistive voltage change differs from the two slower RC responses. The parameter recovery benchmark explains the separate evidence needed when fitting parameters to a known waveform.
These are different evidence questions: a correct forward calculation, recovery from synthetic data, and agreement with a physical experiment. The paper is related reading for the third question; Lemonergy’s supplied examples do not reproduce its experiments, optimizer or state estimator.
Apply the reading to your model
- Identify which parameters you will estimate and which remain fixed.
- Save the current profile, voltage samples, units and sampling interval with the model.
- Compare the complete voltage trace and residuals using the results guide.
- Record the origin of the comparison data. A generated waveform must remain distinguishable from a measurement.